Re: quite big breakthrough in the BAD network performance, which mm6 did not fix

[Matt Heler <lkml@lpbproductions.com>]

Again, this isn't that sufficient enough in proving your case. Like I said 
before, please provide benchmarks from an http ( apache ) server on your 
private network to validate theese claims. 

Matt H.

On Tuesday 06 July 2004 8:49 am, Redeeman wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:53 +0200, Erik Mouw wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Redeeman wrote:
> > > i am aware of this, however, what i use to benchmark is kernel.org, as
> > > i can see they have alot bandwith free.
> > > if i use kernel.org http i get 50kb/s, if i use ftp, i can easily fetch
> > > with 200kb/s
> >
> > That could be easily explained by the fact that the www.kernel.org ftp
> > and http services are handled by different programs (vsftpd vs.
> > Apache).
>
> yeah it could.. however it isnt. because 2.6.5 can easily take 200kb/s
> from kernel.org http, and it sound strange too, that with 2.6.7 ALL http
> adresses only give 50kb/s, and with 2.6.5 it gives 200 :>
>
> > Erik
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/