From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264833AbUGGDCa (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:02:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264860AbUGGDC3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:02:29 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:25069 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264833AbUGGDC3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:02:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 04:02:27 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: Ray Lee Cc: tomstdenis@yahoo.com, eger@havoc.gtf.org, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL Message-ID: <20040707030227.GE12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <1089165901.4373.175.camel@orca.madrabbit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1089165901.4373.175.camel@orca.madrabbit.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:05:01PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > [1] "The great thing about standards is that there are so many > of them to choose from." Wish I could remember who said > that. AST and in this case it actually doesn't apply - everything from K&R to C99 is in agreement here.