From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
Cc: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
tomstdenis@yahoo.com, eger@havoc.gtf.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:34:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040707143407.GZ18841@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040707073059.GA20079@louise.pinerecords.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1057 bytes --]
On Wed, 2004-07-07 09:30:59 +0200, Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
wrote in message <20040707073059.GA20079@louise.pinerecords.com>:
> On Jul-06 2004, Tue, 19:05 -0700
> Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org> wrote:
> > According to K&R, 2nd ed, section A2.5.1 (Integer Constants):
> >
> > The type of an integer depends on its form, value and suffix.
> > [...] If it is unsuffixed octal or hexadecimal, it has the first
> > possible of these types ["in which its value can be represented"
> > -- from omitted]: int, unsigned int, long int, unsigned long
> > int.
>
> Is it safe to assume that C99 compilers append "..., long long int,
> unsigned long long int" to the list?
It is.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak!
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-07 2:05 Ray Lee
2004-07-07 3:02 ` viro
2004-07-07 5:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-07 6:12 ` Ray Lee
2004-07-07 5:55 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-07 6:08 ` Ray Lee
2004-07-07 6:48 ` viro
2004-07-07 17:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-12 17:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-07-07 7:30 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-07-07 14:34 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
2004-07-12 17:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-06 21:56 David Eger
2004-07-07 0:06 ` tom st denis
2004-07-07 3:00 ` viro
2004-07-07 11:10 ` tom st denis
2004-07-07 14:22 ` viro
2004-07-07 18:47 ` tom st denis
2004-07-07 16:30 ` Gabriel Paubert
2004-07-07 18:41 ` tom st denis
2004-07-07 18:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-07-07 18:53 ` tom st denis
2004-07-07 23:17 ` Harald Arnesen
2004-07-08 6:15 ` David Weinehall
2004-07-08 17:16 ` Horst von Brand
2004-07-10 1:52 ` Andrew Rodland
2004-07-07 0:38 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-07-07 4:52 ` David Eger
2004-07-07 11:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040707143407.GZ18841@lug-owl.de \
--to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=eger@havoc.gtf.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=tomstdenis@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®