From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265215AbUGLQI3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:08:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266864AbUGLQI2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:08:28 -0400 Received: from chello212017098056.surfer.at ([212.17.98.56]:21776 "EHLO hofr.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265215AbUGLQI1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:08:27 -0400 From: Der Herr Hofrat Message-Id: <200407121609.i6CG98W28473@hofr.at> Subject: Re: TQM in 2.6.X In-Reply-To: <20040712151937.GM28002@smtp.west.cox.net> from Tom Rini at "Jul 12, 2004 08:19:37 am" To: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:09:08 +0200 (CEST) CC: Der Herr Hofrat , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 11:48:54AM +0200, Der Herr Hofrat wrote: > > > arch/ppc/platforms/tqm8260_setup.c > > > > looks like it is truncated in the 2.6.X tar.bz2 archives from kernel.org > > (checked 2.6.0/5/6) - am I doing something stupid or is vanilla 2.6.X > > just not ready for TQM8260 ? > > The file is supposed to be short. But yes, TQM8260 support has never been > tested in 2.5 or 2.6, so there might be other problems lurking. > > Andrew, please apply. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > > --- 1.3/arch/ppc/platforms/tqm8260_setup.c 2004-06-16 10:56:13 -07:00 > +++ edited/tqm8260_setup.c 2004-07-12 08:17:30 -07:00 > @@ -77,3 +77,4 @@ > > callback_setup_arch = ppc_md.setup_arch; > ppc_md.setup_arch = tqm8260_setup_arch; > +} > I had tried that as it looked obvious - but that does not do it will not compile with this change - so I assumed there is more missing... thanks hofrat