From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264058AbUGLWsh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:48:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264085AbUGLWsh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:48:37 -0400 Received: from [203.178.140.15] ([203.178.140.15]:35846 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264058AbUGLWsg (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:48:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:48:40 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040713.074840.92140725.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> To: cra@WPI.EDU Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: v2.6 IGMPv3 implementation From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <20040712222713.GK7822@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> References: <20040712203056.GI7822@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> <20040712140409.3575b900.davem@redhat.com> <20040712222713.GK7822@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> Organization: USAGI Project X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/ X-Fingerprint: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc X-Face: "5$Al-.M>NJ%a'@hhZdQm:."qn~PA^gq4o*>iCFToq*bAi#4FRtx}enhuQKz7fNqQz\BYU] $~O_5m-9'}MIs`XGwIEscw;e5b>n"B_?j/AkL~i/MEaZBLP X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20040712222713.GK7822@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> (at Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:27:13 -0400), "Charles R. Anderson" says: > Another thing I noticed. Which is better, __u32 or struct in_addr and > int? Both are used in include/linux/in.h for what appear to be the > same objects: Please refer standards (e.g. RFC3678). -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA