From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267310AbUGNGoJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:44:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267313AbUGNGoJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:44:09 -0400 Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.102]:26355 "EHLO pimout3-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267310AbUGNGoG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:44:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:44:00 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Roy Butler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kconfig's file handling (was: XFS: how to NOT null files on fsck?) Message-ID: <20040714064400.GA9721@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <40F4D266.4050006@jpl.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40F4D266.4050006@jpl.nasa.gov> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:27:50PM -0700, Roy Butler wrote: > By example, if you create a file, write to it, and then delete it > fast enough, it will never hit the disk under XFS. Nor will it under some other filesystems... and in the above scenario I'm not sure that matters, why must a temporary file hit the disk at all? --cw