From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NR_KEYS off-by-one error
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:15:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040716201523.GC5518@pclin040.win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040716164435.GA8078@ucw.cz>
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 01:35:59AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
:: KDGKBENT ioctl can use 256 entries (0-255), but it was defined as
:: key_map[NR_KEYS] (NR_KEYS == 255). The code seems also thinking it's 256.
::
:: key_map[0] = U(K_ALLOCATED);
:: for (j = 1; j < NR_KEYS; j++)
:: key_map[j] = U(K_HOLE);
I think the code has no opinion. It was 128 in 2.4.
I am not aware of assumptions on NR_KEYS.
So, do not think this is an off-by-one error.
Vojtech did this intentionally.
However, I have no objections. In fact loadkeys uses 256.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> The patch might cause problems, though, because some apps may (in
> old versions are) using a char variable to index up to NR_KEYS,
> which leads to an endless loop.
The binaries will still work. If the utility is recompiled, against
recent kernel headers, then the person doing that is responsible
for the result.
I just checked kbd, but there are no such char variables there.
Do you have specific utilities in mind? Is X OK?
Andries
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-16 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-16 16:35 OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-16 16:44 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-16 17:18 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-16 20:15 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2004-07-17 6:23 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-26 22:43 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 13:46 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-27 16:37 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-27 17:54 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-27 18:35 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-28 11:51 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-28 16:46 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-28 20:42 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-29 4:10 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-29 6:15 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-29 9:24 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-29 9:49 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-29 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-29 23:51 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-30 1:25 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-07-30 7:27 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-30 8:07 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-30 8:41 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-07-30 8:51 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-30 9:03 ` Vojtech Pavlik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040716201523.GC5518@pclin040.win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®