From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266129AbUGTT5Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:57:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266213AbUGTT4a (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:56:30 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:25048 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266208AbUGTTzx (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:55:52 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, Linux Kernel Development , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] depends on PCI DMA API: Adaptec AIC7xxx_old Message-ID: <20040720195552.GB2820@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200407201839.i6KIdo2I015550@anakin.of.borg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407201839.i6KIdo2I015550@anakin.of.borg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 08:39:50PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Adaptec AIC7xxx_old unconditionally depends on the PCI DMA API, so mark it > broken if !PCI Shouldn't we rather have dummy PCI DMA APIs? -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain