From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267488AbUGWCIE (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:08:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267489AbUGWCID (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:08:03 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:31637 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267488AbUGWCH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:07:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:07:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Shantanu Goel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [VM PATCH 2.6.8-rc1] Prevent excessive scanning of lower zone Message-Id: <20040722220701.7de4c31f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040723014052.69937.qmail@web12826.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040723014052.69937.qmail@web12826.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shantanu Goel wrote: > > I emailed this a few weeks back to the list but it > seems to have gotten lost... It came through. I was unable to reproduce the disproportional scanning rate on almost exactly the same setup, so I parked the problem for a while. I do agree with the analysis though. The problem _could_ occur. I dunno why it happens for you and not for me...