From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267436AbUGWHr5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:47:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267439AbUGWHr5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:47:57 -0400 Received: from web53810.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.36.205]:59529 "HELO web53810.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267436AbUGWHrz (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:47:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20040723074755.95284.qmail@web53810.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:47:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Spalletta Subject: RE: [PATCH] remove 55 dead prototypes from include/acpi/acdisasm.h To: lkml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Carl Spalletta [mailto:cspalletta@yahoo.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:36 PM >> To: Moore, Robert; lkml >> Cc: Brown, Len; acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: RE: [PATCH] remove 55 dead prototypes from include/acpi/acdisasm.h >>> --- "Moore, Robert" wrote: >>> These aren't nonexistent functions, they are part of the AML >>> disassembler (which is not always configured into the kernel) >> With respect, I cannot find the functions listed below anywhere in >> the kernel.org kernel. Where are they? > --- "Moore, Robert" wrote: > Subject: RE: [PATCH] remove 55 dead prototypes from include/acpi/acdisasm.h > Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:48:12 -0700 > The ACPI CA AML debugger and disassembler haven't been integrated into > the kernel yet, but development is underway and almost complete. Yes, it is technically correct to say it "is not always configured into the kernel" but it would be equally correct, and less misleading to say it is "never configured into the kernel, because the code is not there".