From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel events layer
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:03:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040723200335.521fe42a.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090604517.13415.0.camel@lucy>
Robert Love <rml@ximian.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew, et al,
>
> OK, Kernel Summit and my OLS talk are over, so here are the goods.
>
> Following patch implements the kernel events layer, which is a simple
> wrapper around netlink to allow asynchronous communication from the
> kernel to user-space of events, errors, logging, and so on.
>
> Current intention is to hook the kernel via this interface into D-BUS,
> although the patch is intended to be agnostic to any of that and policy
> free.
>
> D-BUS can be found here:
>
> http://dbus.freedesktop.org/
>
> Other user-space utilities (including code to utilize this) can be found
> here:
>
> http://vrfy.org/projects/kdbusd/
>
> This patch only implements a single event, processor temperature
> detection. Other useful events include md sync, filesystem mount,
> driver errors, etc. We can add those later, on a case-by-case basis. I
> would like to be more careful with adding events than we are with adding
> printk's, with some aim toward a stable interface.
OK. Can you give us a ballpark estimate of how many send_kmessage() calls
we're likely to have in two years time?
> Usage of the new interface is simple:
>
> send_kmessage(group, interface, message, ...)
>
> Credit to Arjan for the initial implementation, Kay Sievers for some
> updates, and the netlink code.
- The GFP_ATOMIC page allocation is unfortunate. Please pass in the
gfp_flags, or change it to GFP_KERNEL and provide a separate
send_kmessage_atomic()?
- Methinks the kernel won't build if the user set CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV=n
- When fixing that up, please add CONFIG_KERNEL_EVENTS or whatever,
provide the appropriate do-nothing stubs if it's disabled. For the tiny
systems.
- send_kmessage() is racy against kmessage_exit(). I'm not sure that's
worth fixing - if you agree then it would set minds at ease to simply
remove kmessage_exit().
- This code will never work as a module, so why include the
MODULE_AUTHOR/DESCRIPTION/etc?
- What led to the decision to export send_kmessage() to only GPL modules?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-24 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 17:41 Robert Love
2004-07-23 18:25 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-07-23 18:35 ` Robert Love
2004-07-23 21:32 ` Dan Aloni
2004-07-24 2:47 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 4:42 ` Keith Owens
2004-07-24 5:00 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 8:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 5:37 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:02 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:43 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-07-24 20:21 ` James Morris
2004-07-25 2:12 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:53 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-24 11:37 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-07-24 3:02 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 3:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:15 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 15:08 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 15:45 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 17:33 ` Ryan Anderson
2004-07-24 17:46 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-24 18:19 ` Robert Love
2004-07-25 18:11 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-25 19:08 ` Robert Love
2004-07-27 5:09 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-07-24 17:54 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 18:13 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 20:08 ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-07-26 20:10 ` Robert Love
2004-08-09 13:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-09 19:47 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 3:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-07-24 2:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:15 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 5:41 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 3:11 ` [patch] kernel events layer, updated Robert Love
2004-07-24 7:58 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 8:23 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-26 6:04 [patch] kernel events layer Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 23:00 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-26 7:31 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 14:50 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 16:12 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 18:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-26 18:15 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 19:03 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 20:44 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-27 18:15 ` Mike Waychison
2004-07-27 18:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-27 18:37 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-26 22:58 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-27 7:08 ` Deepak Saxena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040723200335.521fe42a.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@ximian.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®