From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Benjamin Rutt <rutt.4+news@osu.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clearing filesystem cache for I/O benchmarks
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:40:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040726234005.597a94db.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pt6iq5u2.fsf@osu.edu>
(Please don't remove people from the email recipient list when doing kernel
work.)
Benjamin Rutt <rutt.4+news@osu.edu> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
>
> > Benjamin Rutt <rutt.4+news@osu.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> How can I purge all of the kernel's filesystem caches, so I can trust
> >> that my I/O (read) requests I'm trying to benchmark bypass the kernel
> >> filesystem cache?
> >
> > Either delete the benchmark test files or
>
> I'm not sure I follow. If I delete the benchmark files, I'll only
> need to create them again later in order to do a read test, and I'll
> have the same problem then, of how to eliminate the just-written-data
> from cache.
OK.
> Thanks for the reference, I wasn't aware of that one. We are running
> some 2.4 kernels in our storage cluster unfortunately so that won't be
> usable for us everywhere. I take it POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED is ignored
> under 2.4.
posix_fadvise() will return -ENOSYS under 2.4.
However... If you write any amount of data to a file with O_DIRECT, that
will, as a side-effect, remove _all_ of that file's pagecache. In 2.4 as
well as 2.6. So you could scrub the pagecache by reading the first 4k then
writing it back with O_DIRECT.
However O_DIRECT is supported on very few filesystems in 2.4. ext2 and
reiserfs have it.
XFS in 2.4 has O_DIRECT, I think, but I don't know if the invalidation
side-effect works on XFS.
> A related question...if no posix_fadvise() advice has been given, does
> reading sequentially every byte of an 8GB file on a machine with <=
> 8GB of RAM guarantee that any page cache data that existed on the
> machine prior to the start of the 8GB read is now gone?
It's not guaranteed that this will work - if the pages which you're trying
to evict were accessed multiple times then it may take more page
replacement to reliably shoot them down. But writing a 2xmemory file and
then deleting it will be a reasonably effective way of evicting most of
the other pagecache.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 22:54 Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-24 5:21 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 5:31 ` Tim Wright
2004-07-26 0:07 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-26 1:40 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-07-26 12:47 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-25 8:11 ` Andreas Haumer
2004-07-26 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 13:02 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-27 6:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-07-27 7:16 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-27 17:31 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-27 18:03 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-28 12:38 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-28 17:03 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-28 18:19 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-27 17:25 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-27 20:00 ` Timothy Miller
2004-07-28 12:51 ` Benjamin Rutt
2004-07-29 1:05 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040726234005.597a94db.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rutt.4+news@osu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®