From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Subject: Re: 2.6.8-rc2 crashes
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:26:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407281926.29920.gene.heskett@verizon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407271331.13081.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Greetings all;
I just had another crash, but this one was different.
/dev/hda5 developed an error and was remounted read
only by the system. As thats /root, everything pretty
much came to a screeching halt several hours ago while
I was out carving the tapered ends on some split rail
fencing, a somewhat dangerous job because its arsenic
treated wood, and I made a large leaf bag of sawdust
and wood chips with bare hands and no resperator filter
device.
Here is the log for the event:
---------------
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5): ext3_free_blocks: bit already
cleared for block 761450
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: Aborting journal on device hda5.
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: ext3_free_blocks: aborting transaction: Journal has aborted
in __ext3_journal_get_undo_access<2>EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in ext3_free_blocks: Jour
nal has aborted
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote last message repeated 16 times
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: ext3_reserve_inode_write: aborting transaction: Journal has
aborted in __ext3_journal_get_write_access<2>EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in ext3_reserve_
inode_write: Journal has aborted
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in ext3_truncate: Journal has a
borted
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: ext3_reserve_inode_write: aborting transaction: Journal has
aborted in __ext3_journal_get_write_access<2>EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in ext3_reserve_
inode_write: Journal has aborted
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in ext3_orphan_del: Journal has
aborted
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: ext3_reserve_inode_write: aborting transaction: Journal has
aborted in __ext3_journal_get_write_access<2>EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in ext3_reserve_
inode_write: Journal has aborted
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: EXT3-fs error (device hda5) in ext3_delete_inode: Journal h
as aborted
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: ext3_abort called.
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: EXT3-fs abort (device hda5): ext3_journal_start: Detected a
borted journal
Jul 28 13:37:00 coyote kernel: Remounting filesystem read-only
Jul 28 18:34:29 coyote shutdown: shutting down for system reboot
On the reboot and e2fsck of /dev/hda5, one inode had
zero dtime and was fixed.
This is the third crash today. I'm now building a plain
2.6.7 to run on this board as thats the newest version that
has a diff in fs/dcache.c, from 2.6.7-mm1 they are all identical.
>On Tuesday 27 July 2004 10:29,
> viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
>
>wrote:
>>On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:33:04PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Greetings everybody;
>>>
>>> I have now had 4 crashes while running 2.6.8-rc2, the last one
>>> requiring a full powerdown before the intel-8x0 could
>>> re-establish control over the sound.
>>>
>>> All have had an initial Opps located in prune_dcache, and were
>>> logged as follows:
>>> Jul 27 07:58:58 coyote kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL
>>> pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
>>
>>... which means that dentry_unused list got corrupted, which
>> doesn't really help. Could you try to narrow it down to
>> 2.6.8-rc1-bk<day>?
>
>And something else that doesn't help, I just found that 2.6.8-rc1
>doesn't have the reverse engineered nforce2 support, so a remake for
>this mobo probably won't fly past the decompression stage. But
>2.6.8-rc1-mm1 does have it, but under a different xconfig entry.
> Its building now.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.24% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-28 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-27 16:33 Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 13:37 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-07-27 14:29 ` viro
2004-07-27 17:02 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 16:51 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-07-27 17:43 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 17:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-07-27 18:02 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 17:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-07-27 18:36 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 18:42 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 19:23 ` viro
2004-07-27 22:17 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 21:40 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-27 22:21 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 17:15 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 19:26 ` viro
2004-07-27 22:24 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 22:25 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-28 11:20 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-28 11:38 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-07-28 12:52 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-27 17:31 ` Gene Heskett
2004-07-28 23:26 ` Gene Heskett [this message]
2004-07-29 12:53 ` Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407281926.29920.gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--to=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®