mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Oravec <jan.oravec@6com.sk>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LSI 53c1030 (Fusion MPT) performance with O_SYNC
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:12:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040729111217.GA29466@omega.6com.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091095493.2792.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:04:53PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 11:56, Jan Oravec wrote:
> 
> > I've noticed poor performance with MySQL/InnoDB when compared to another
> > S2880-based box with IDE disks.
> 
> your ide disk probably has write back caching enabled while your
> mptfusion doesn't..... if you value data integrity over performance the
> mptfusion has a saner default ;)

It was enabled:

# sginfo -c /dev/sda
Caching mode page (0x8)
-----------------------
Initiator Control                  0
ABPF                               0
CAP                                0
DISC                               1
SIZE                               0
Write Cache Enabled                1
MF                                 0
Read Cache Disabled                0
Demand Read Retention Priority     0
Demand Write Retention Priority    0
Disable Pre-fetch Transfer Length  65535
Minimum Pre-fetch                  0
Maximum Pre-fetch                  0
Maximum Pre-fetch Ceiling          65535
FSW                                1
LBCSS                              0
DRA                                0
Number of Cache Segments           8
Cache Segment size                 0
Non-Cache Segment size             0

When I've disabled it on both mptfusion and IDE, it took 40s on mpt and 83s
on IDE.

It seems like write-cache is not as effective on mptfusion as it is on IDE?

I am considering plugging there a ZCR with battery, so write-cache has a
sense for me.


Jan

      reply	other threads:[~2004-07-29 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-29  9:56 Jan Oravec
2004-07-29 10:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-29 11:12   ` Jan Oravec [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040729111217.GA29466@omega.6com.net \
    --to=jan.oravec@6com.sk \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®