From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: mnalis@voyager.hr
Cc: Kazrak+kernel@cesmail.net, bunk@fs.tum.de,
mnalis-umsdos@voyager.hr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] remove UMSDOS
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:29:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040729152943.385f05e1.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040724182627.GA3767@eagle.earth.my>
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:26:27 +0200 mnalis@voyager.hr wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 12:17:32PM -0600, Jeff Woods wrote:
| > At 7/11/2004 01:28 PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| > >UMSDOS in 2.6 is broken, and it seems no one needs it enough to bother
| > >fixing it.
|
| Just to notify anybody interested that I have started working on fixing
| UMSDOS support for 2.6 kernels (as there still seems to be some people
| wanting it).
|
| Patch that enables UMSDOS to compile and insmod is available at
| http://linux.voyager.hr/umsdos/
| It still doesn't work (triggers kernel BUG() after few write ops),
| but I'll post another announcements when I get it in working condition.
I posted a umsdos patch (to build on 2.6.0-test) last October/2003.
See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=106697862024272&w=2
and see Al Viro's reply to that.
Anyway, I just updated my patch to build on 2.6.8-rc2-bk8, so my patch
is quite similar to yours now. Yours is a small bit ahead of mine.
http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/patches/umsdos-build-268rc2bk8.patch
--
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-29 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-11 11:28 Adrian Bunk
2004-07-11 18:17 ` Jeff Woods
2004-07-11 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-07-24 18:26 ` mnalis
2004-07-29 22:29 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040729152943.385f05e1.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=Kazrak+kernel@cesmail.net \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mnalis-umsdos@voyager.hr \
--cc=mnalis@voyager.hr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®