From: Kiko Piris <kernel@pirispons.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: ipsec and/or netfilter problem
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:04:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040729190401.GA11195@mortadelo.pirispons.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410844F2.3030503@trash.net>
[ Please CC me on reply, I'm subscribed to linux-kernel
but not to netfilter-devel ]
On 29/07/2004 at 02:29 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Kiko Piris wrote:
> >The problem is that the server sends the data to Internet without doing
> >SNAT (checked with tcpdump) (the packets do not traverse the POSTROUTING
> >chain in nat table, checked watching the pkts counters).
> >
> >Anyone has any hint?
>
> You could try the netfilter+ipsec patches in netfilter patch-o-matic-ng,
> they should solve this problem,
Hi Patrick
I've tried those patches with 2.6.6 and I see the same behaviour,
packets do not traverse POSTROUTING chain in nat table (and thus they
are not s-natted).
What I did was to manually aply the following patches from
patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 to a vanilla 2.6.6 tree:
nf_reset
ipsec-01-output-hooks
ipsec-02-input-hooks
ipsec-03-policy-lookup
ipsec-04-policy-checks
did I miss something? (I understood from your email and from
patch-o-matic-ng-20040621/ipsec-*/info files that this was enough, maybe
it wasn't... O:-).
> The current patches only apply to 2.6.6, but I will update them next
> week
I can wait until then, no problem...
Thanks a lot for responding.
--
Kiko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-29 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 21:28 Kiko Piris
2004-07-29 0:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-07-29 19:04 ` Kiko Piris [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040729190401.GA11195@mortadelo.pirispons.net \
--to=kernel@pirispons.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®