From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265196AbUHAEqx (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 00:46:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265198AbUHAEqw (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 00:46:52 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:32195 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265196AbUHAEqv (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 00:46:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:45:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: colpatch@us.ibm.com Cc: anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Create cpu_sibling_map for PPC64 Message-Id: <20040731214512.36123c10.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1091049554.19459.33.camel@arrakis> References: <1091049554.19459.33.camel@arrakis> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthew Dobson wrote: > > In light of some proposed changes in the sched_domains code, I coded up > this little ditty that simply creates and populates a cpu_sibling_map > for PPC64 machines. err, did you compile it? --- 25-power4/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c~create-cpu_sibling_map-for-ppc64-fix 2004-07-31 21:43:18.620845384 -0700 +++ 25-power4-akpm/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c 2004-07-31 21:43:21.258444408 -0700 @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ cpumask_t cpu_possible_map = CPU_MASK_NO cpumask_t cpu_online_map = CPU_MASK_NONE; cpumask_t cpu_available_map = CPU_MASK_NONE; cpumask_t cpu_present_at_boot = CPU_MASK_NONE; -cpumask_t cpu_sibling_map[NR_CPUS] = { [0 .. NR_CPUS-1] = CPU_MASK_NONE }; +cpumask_t cpu_sibling_map[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = CPU_MASK_NONE }; EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_online_map); EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map); _