From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] filemap_fdatawrite range interface
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:22:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040801075219.GD7327@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040801074518.GA7310@in.ibm.com>
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 01:15:18PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
>
> The attached patches (generated against 2.6.8-rc2) enable concurrent
> O_SYNC writers to different parts of the same file by avoiding
> serialising on i_sem across the wait for IO completion.
>
> This is mostly your work, ported to the tagged radix tree VFS changes
> and a few fixes. I have been carrying these patches for sometime now;
> they can be the merged upstream. Please apply.
>
[4] fdatawrite-range.patch
Regards
Suparna
--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India
--------------------------------------------------------
Range based equivalent of filemap_fdatawrite for O_SYNC writers (to go
with writepages range support added to mpage_writepages).
If both <start> and <end> are zero, then it defaults to writing
back all of the mapping's dirty pages.
Signed-off-by: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
linux-2.6.8-rc2-suparna/mm/filemap.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/filemap.c~fdatawrite-range mm/filemap.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2/mm/filemap.c~fdatawrite-range 2004-08-01 12:34:34.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-suparna/mm/filemap.c 2004-08-01 12:34:34.000000000 +0530
@@ -142,20 +142,26 @@ static inline int sync_page(struct page
}
/**
- * filemap_fdatawrite - start writeback against all of a mapping's dirty pages
+ * filemap_fdatawrite_range - start writeback against all of a mapping's
+ * dirty pages that lie within the byte offsets <start, end>
* @mapping: address space structure to write
+ * @start: offset in bytes where the range starts
+ * @end : offset in bytes where the range ends
*
* If sync_mode is WB_SYNC_ALL then this is a "data integrity" operation, as
* opposed to a regular memory * cleansing writeback. The difference between
* these two operations is that if a dirty page/buffer is encountered, it must
* be waited upon, and not just skipped over.
*/
-static int __filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping, int sync_mode)
+static int __filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+ loff_t start, loff_t end, int sync_mode)
{
int ret;
struct writeback_control wbc = {
.sync_mode = sync_mode,
.nr_to_write = mapping->nrpages * 2,
+ .start = start,
+ .end = end,
};
if (mapping->backing_dev_info->memory_backed)
@@ -165,12 +171,25 @@ static int __filemap_fdatawrite(struct a
return ret;
}
+static inline int __filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping,
+ int sync_mode)
+{
+ return __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, 0, 0, sync_mode);
+}
+
int filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping)
{
return __filemap_fdatawrite(mapping, WB_SYNC_ALL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_fdatawrite);
+int filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+ loff_t start, loff_t end)
+{
+ return __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, start, end, WB_SYNC_ALL);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_fdatawrite_range);
+
/*
* This is a mostly non-blocking flush. Not suitable for data-integrity
* purposes - I/O may not be started against all dirty pages.
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-01 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-01 7:45 [PATCH 0/5] Concurrent O_SYNC write speedups using radix-tree walks Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01 7:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] Writeback page range hint Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01 7:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] Fix writeback page range to use exact limits Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01 7:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] mpage writepages range limit fix Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01 7:52 ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2004-08-01 7:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] Concurrent O_SYNC write support Suparna Bhattacharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040801075219.GD7327@in.ibm.com \
--to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome