mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] filemap_fdatawrite range interface
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:22:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040801075219.GD7327@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040801074518.GA7310@in.ibm.com>

On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 01:15:18PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> 
> The attached patches (generated against 2.6.8-rc2) enable concurrent 
> O_SYNC writers to different parts of the same file by avoiding 
> serialising on i_sem across the wait for IO completion.
> 
> This is mostly your work, ported to the tagged radix tree VFS changes
> and a few fixes. I have been carrying these patches for sometime now; 
> they can be the merged upstream. Please apply.
> 

[4] fdatawrite-range.patch

Regards
Suparna

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India

--------------------------------------------------------

Range based equivalent of filemap_fdatawrite for O_SYNC writers (to go
with writepages range support added to mpage_writepages).
If both <start> and <end> are zero, then it defaults to writing
back all of the mapping's dirty pages.

Signed-off-by: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>

 linux-2.6.8-rc2-suparna/mm/filemap.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/filemap.c~fdatawrite-range mm/filemap.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2/mm/filemap.c~fdatawrite-range	2004-08-01 12:34:34.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-suparna/mm/filemap.c	2004-08-01 12:34:34.000000000 +0530
@@ -142,20 +142,26 @@ static inline int sync_page(struct page 
 }
 
 /**
- * filemap_fdatawrite - start writeback against all of a mapping's dirty pages
+ * filemap_fdatawrite_range - start writeback against all of a mapping's
+ * dirty pages that lie within the byte offsets <start, end>
  * @mapping: address space structure to write
+ * @start: offset in bytes where the range starts
+ * @end : offset in bytes where the range ends
  *
  * If sync_mode is WB_SYNC_ALL then this is a "data integrity" operation, as
  * opposed to a regular memory * cleansing writeback.  The difference between
  * these two operations is that if a dirty page/buffer is encountered, it must
  * be waited upon, and not just skipped over.
  */
-static int __filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping, int sync_mode)
+static int __filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+	loff_t start, loff_t end, int sync_mode)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct writeback_control wbc = {
 		.sync_mode = sync_mode,
 		.nr_to_write = mapping->nrpages * 2,
+		.start = start,
+		.end = end,
 	};
 
 	if (mapping->backing_dev_info->memory_backed)
@@ -165,12 +171,25 @@ static int __filemap_fdatawrite(struct a
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static inline int __filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping,
+	int sync_mode)
+{
+	return __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, 0, 0, sync_mode);
+}
+
 int filemap_fdatawrite(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
 	return __filemap_fdatawrite(mapping, WB_SYNC_ALL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_fdatawrite);
 
+int filemap_fdatawrite_range(struct address_space *mapping,
+	loff_t start, loff_t end)
+{
+	return __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, start, end, WB_SYNC_ALL);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_fdatawrite_range);
+
 /*
  * This is a mostly non-blocking flush.  Not suitable for data-integrity
  * purposes - I/O may not be started against all dirty pages.

_

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-01  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-01  7:45 [PATCH 0/5] Concurrent O_SYNC write speedups using radix-tree walks Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01  7:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] Writeback page range hint Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01  7:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] Fix writeback page range to use exact limits Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01  7:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] mpage writepages range limit fix Suparna Bhattacharya
2004-08-01  7:52 ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2004-08-01  7:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] Concurrent O_SYNC write support Suparna Bhattacharya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040801075219.GD7327@in.ibm.com \
    --to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome