From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266170AbUHAU1N (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:27:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266173AbUHAU1N (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:27:13 -0400 Received: from bbned23-32-100.dsl.hccnet.nl ([80.100.32.23]:25297 "EHLO fw-loc.vanvergehaald.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266170AbUHAU1M (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:27:12 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 22:26:59 +0200 From: Toon van der Pas To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCSI removable devices problem Message-ID: <20040801202659.GA30205@hout.vanvergehaald.nl> References: <20040801141931.6e026422.pochini@shiny.it> <20040801092421.3f138fac.rddunlap@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040801092421.3f138fac.rddunlap@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:24:21AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 14:19:31 +0200 Giuliano Pochini wrote: > > > mount: /dev/sdb1 is not a valid block device > > I think that it's been this way for some time now... > > Does using > blockdev --rereadpt /dev/sdb1 > help? You probably meant to write: blockdev --rereadpt /dev/sdb Regards, Toon. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan