From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262927AbUHBULn (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:11:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262906AbUHBULm (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:11:42 -0400 Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.77]:30879 "EHLO pimout1-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262932AbUHBULd (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:11:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:10:40 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andi Kleen , Guillaume Thouvenin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch for review] BSD accounting IO stats Message-ID: <20040802201040.GB25664@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:11:27PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > It may be easier to do this at write(2) time, making the > assumption that most IO done there will eventually hit > the filesystem. but for lots of loads that's not true, consider the case of temporary files which usually never hit the disk before being unlinked --cw