From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@yahoo.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Romanick <idr@us.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"DRI developer's list" <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: DRM code reorganization
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:09:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040802230913.60350.qmail@web14924.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040802210935.GF12724@redhat.com>
--- Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> Another possibility of course is that the BSD & Linux kernel side
> bits go their separate ways. How active is the kernel side of the
> BSD world ?
I'll probably get flamed to death for suggesting this, but why not?
What about leaving BSD working with the current code and moving forward
on Linux alone? The thread "OLS and console rearchitecture" describes a
lot of changes to the graphics system. Some of these are much easier to
achieve on Linux than BSD since some the underlying operations are
supported in the Linux kernel and not in the BSD one. After we achieve
a new stable point, maybe the first X on GL release, we back port
everything to BSD.
One problem right now is that there are only one or two BSD developers,
all of the rest are Linux based. Most of the Linux based people have no
clue as to BSD's capabilities. Wouldn't it simply be more efficient to
put BSD on hold for a while and then resynch after everything has stabilized?
=====
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-02 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-02 15:53 Jon Smirl
2004-08-02 18:02 ` Ian Romanick
2004-08-02 18:27 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-08-02 18:57 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-02 18:16 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-02 20:11 ` Ian Romanick
2004-08-02 20:42 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-02 21:09 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-02 21:51 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-08-02 23:09 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2004-08-02 23:24 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-02 20:45 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-02 23:53 ` Ian Romanick
2004-08-03 7:52 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-08-03 16:28 ` Ian Romanick
2004-08-03 16:49 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-08-03 0:06 ` Dave Airlie
2004-08-03 6:13 ` Eric Anholt
2004-08-02 23:48 ` Dave Airlie
2004-08-02 23:26 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040802230913.60350.qmail@web14924.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=jonsmirl@yahoo.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=idr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®