From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265048AbUHCGLe (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 02:11:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265053AbUHCGLe (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 02:11:34 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:2798 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265048AbUHCGLb (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 02:11:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:09:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Justin Guyett Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hibbard.Smith@nasdaq.com Subject: Re: mainline i2o issues with adaptec raid (was: i2o and adaptec raid) Message-Id: <20040802230931.04c0769d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040803050223.GB2295@arion.soze.net> References: <20040803050223.GB2295@arion.soze.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Justin Guyett wrote: > > I just started toying with an adaptec i2o card, an Adaptec 2110s, and > for random reads and writes bonnie++ shows that the i2o driver is > somewhat slower than the dpt_i2o driver. By reading your .config I was able to divine that you're running some 2.6 kernel ;) There's an i2o rewrite in ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.8-rc2/2.6.8-rc2-mm2/2.6.8-rc2-mm2.gz - testing of that would be appreciated.