From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267508AbUHDX0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:26:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267507AbUHDX0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:26:23 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:30874 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267505AbUHDX0E (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:26:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:29:28 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cciss update [1 of 6] Message-Id: <20040804162928.5c3d2262.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" wrote: > > Patch 1 of 6 > Name: p001_ioctl32_fix_for_268rc2.patch It would make life easier for me if you could give each patch a nice Subject: which describes what it does. "cciss update [N of 6]" isn't very meaningful. And the name of the file into which you chose to place the patch isn't a suitable description either. Thanks. All of these patches are generating rejects for me - eager beavers have been patching your driver when you weren't looking. Could you please redo and reissue the patch series against -rc3? Thanks.