From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267575AbUHEFU1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:20:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267555AbUHEFT7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:19:59 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:493 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267550AbUHEFTv (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:19:51 -0400 Message-Id: <200408050520.i755K6503436@owlet.beaverton.ibm.com> To: "Martin J. Bligh" cc: Peter Williams , Andrew Morton , kernel@kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.8-rc2-mm2 performance improvements (scheduler?) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:59:39 PDT." <239380000.1091663979@flay> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 22:20:06 -0700 From: Rick Lindsley Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rick showed me schedstats graphs of the two ... it seems to have lower latency, does less rebalancing, fewer pull_tasks, etc, etc. Everything looks better ... he'll send them out soon, I think (hint, hint). Okay, they're done. Here's the URL of the graphs: http://eaglet.rain.com/rick/linux/staircase/scase-vs-noscase.html General summary: as Martin reported, we're seeing improvements in a number of areas, at least with sdet. The graphs as listed there represent stats from four separate sdet runs run sequentially with an increasing load. (We're trying to see if we can get the information from each run separately, rather than the aggregate -- one of the hazards of an automated test harness :) Rick