From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267582AbUHEHKT (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 03:10:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267583AbUHEHKT (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 03:10:19 -0400 Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.67]:43216 "EHLO webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267582AbUHEHKL (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 03:10:11 -0400 X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.81) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 5 Aug 2004 07:07:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Clayton Weaver" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:10:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSI 1.0.0 released!! X-Originating-Ip: 172.135.58.171 X-Originating-Server: ws1-2.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20040805071010.89D621F50B1@ws1-2.us4.outblaze.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just out of curiousity, how does Beowulf handle devices across nodes? Seems like it would have comparable issues to deal with, and if they were using devfs in its present form we would have heard a lot about it by now (remembering Beowulf user input into the old network latency under load discussions.) Is the Beowulf code still online, open source, etc? Regards, Clayton Weaver (anything after this is the price of free email) -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm