From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267816AbUHERb0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:31:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267803AbUHERb0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:31:26 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:6588 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267802AbUHERbT (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:31:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:29:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Rik van Riel Cc: rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] increase mlock limit to 32k Message-Id: <20040805102933.0c95d12a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20040805081445.1c4b085e.rddunlap@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rik van Riel wrote: > > Andrew, I'll send you an updated patch (not an incremental) > later today. Well please note that the initial patch got 100% rejects because it was against a kernel which was already using limits of PAGE_SIZE rather than zero. An incremental patch might be saner..