From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268167AbUHFPv7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:51:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268164AbUHFPup (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:50:45 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:53964 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268157AbUHFPtI (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:49:08 -0400 From: Russ Anderson Message-Id: <200408061547.i76FlY8U009151@ben.americas.sgi.com> Subject: Re: Altix I/O code reorganization To: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:47:34 -0500 (CDT) Cc: pfg@sgi.com (Pat Gefre), linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20040806141836.A9854@infradead.org> from "Christoph Hellwig" at Aug 06, 2004 02:18:36 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > 006-bte: > Please merge bte_error.c into the existing bte.c bte_crb_error_handler() is called from hubiio_crb_error_handler() in arch/ia64/sn/io/sn2/shuberror.c. That's why bte_error.c is in the same directory as shuberror.c (and not in arch/ia64/sn/kernel with bte.c). If bte_error.c is merged, wouldn't it make more sense to merge it with shuberror.c? Thanks, -- Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com