From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268163AbUHFQuN (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:50:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268191AbUHFQrX (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:47:23 -0400 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:27577 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268163AbUHFQow (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:44:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:44:07 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: James Morris Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re-implemented i586 asm AES (updated) Message-ID: <20040806164407.GC2065@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 August 2004 12:17:59 -0400, James Morris wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > You could use .altinstructions to patch a jump in at runtime > > based on CPU capabilities. Assuming MMX is really faster of course. > > Neat. The latter could be measured at boot. Or lazily on first usage. If it doesn't have to be done at boot time, why delay the user with it? Jörn -- Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein