From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268215AbUHFRkX (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:40:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268206AbUHFR3J (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:29:09 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:35593 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268182AbUHFR2A (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:28:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:27:56 +0100 From: Russell King To: Emmeran Seehuber Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.7-ck6: Yenta TI: irq 5: nobody cared! Message-ID: <20040806182756.G13948@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Emmeran Seehuber , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200408021527.13902.rototor@rototor.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200408021527.13902.rototor@rototor.de>; from rototor@rototor.de on Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:27:13PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:27:13PM +0200, Emmeran Seehuber wrote: > P.S.: CC please, since I'm not subscribed. > P.P.S.: Yes, the kernel is tainted by the vmware modules. But that should not > be related, should it? No idea - always try running without proprietary modules to check that it is indeed a stock kernel problem. I suspect it will be in this case, but please check anyway. Also, you may like to consider reporting the problem (without VMware loaded) to the linux-pcmcia list at lists.infradead.org, where the guys who developed this probing code hang out. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core