From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266211AbUHGB2p (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:28:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267900AbUHGB2p (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:28:45 -0400 Received: from out002pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.141]:19147 "EHLO out002.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266211AbUHGB2m (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:28:42 -0400 From: Gene Heskett Reply-To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Organization: Organization: None, detectable by casual observers To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Possible dcache BUG Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:28:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.82 Cc: Denis Vlasenko References: <200408051019.44268.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <200408070203.35268.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> In-Reply-To: <200408070203.35268.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200408062128.39882.gene.heskett@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out002.verizon.net from [151.205.8.94] at Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:28:41 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 06 August 2004 19:03, Denis Vlasenko wrote: >Hi Gene, > >Please do not remove my address from To or CC >fields, I can miss your emails otherwise. > Denis: Mmm, sorry. I was in the habit of using a button on kmail that replies only to the mailing list, thinking that then I wasn't bombarding everyone with 2 or more copies of my replies. I've now re-arranged it so that I have a "reply all" button, and will use that one from now on unless the subject is really OT. Linus: One comment re the patch, I'm seeing a huge slowdown in the seti processing, its only done about 2.5 units since 6am local, and it should be well into the 4th by now. Anybody: Speaking of somewhat OT, what is the command I should use to actually turn on the PREEMPT option in the kernel? Its on in the compile, but I think I read someplace where I had to do an "echo 1 >someplace in /proc" to actually enable it. I've survived over 24 hours now with the patch Linus sent, and I thought maybe I'd get some exersize pushing my luck :) [...] -- Cheers Denis, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.24% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.