From: Josh Radel <jraidman-linux@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: elevator abstraction, anticipatory I/O backported to 2.4?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:03:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040807000316.85612.qmail@web81706.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
Are there any existing patches for a backport of the
2.6 elevator abstraction (or a specific patch for
anticipatory I/O) to 2.4 kernels?
I've heard rumors that Digeo backported a 2.6 I/O
scheduler. However, when I tried to download their
open source modifications from
http://www.digeo.com/prodserv/opensource.jsp, I wasn't
able to extract their work. (The zip file unzips to a
tar.bz2, which seems to be corrupt.) Who knows, maybe
an I/O scheduler backport isn't in that archive
anyway.
Please CC me on any response.
Thanks,
Josh
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-07 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-07 0:03 Josh Radel [this message]
2004-08-07 5:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-09 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040807000316.85612.qmail@web81706.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=jraidman-linux@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®