From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265255AbUHHLV1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 07:21:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265256AbUHHLV1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 07:21:27 -0400 Received: from server02.akkaya.de ([213.168.83.203]:10517 "EHLO server02.akkaya.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265255AbUHHLV0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Aug 2004 07:21:26 -0400 From: Juergen Pabel To: Eric Lammerts Subject: Re: [PATCH] Masking kernel commandline parameters (2.6.7) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:21:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200408080413.29905.jpabel@akkaya.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200408081321.20571.jpabel@akkaya.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 August 2004 04:44, Eric Lammerts wrote: > That would make that ugly kernel patch pointless, wouldn't it? Then > why bother with it? Not if the authentication yields the key that will be passed (as a hidden/secret) parameter to the boot kernel... jp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBFgyqz6J7R+QJGuwRAqGmAJ4gcz13sdtzlTag4VSXa6hIk45qaQCaA+ya KX9zGZE4FHEHlJ99GNVqm0k= =WJ5a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----