From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264377AbUHJLmF (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:42:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264419AbUHJLmF (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:42:05 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:48844 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264377AbUHJLmB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:42:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:44:19 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Karol Kozimor Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm swsusp: do not default to platform/firmware Message-ID: <20040809194418.GA1862@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20040728222445.GA18210@elf.ucw.cz> <20040802153021.354C9AF200@voldemort.scrye.com> <200408031328.14595.kkozimor@aurox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408031328.14595.kkozimor@aurox.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Patrick> I'd rather leave it, and put pressure on the platform > > Patrick> implementations to be made to work. If you want to shutdown, > > Patrick> then specify it on the command line before you suspend (or > > Patrick> add it to the suspend script). > > > > Does _anyone_ have a machine where platform works? > > > > I can't recally anyone posted on the acpi/swsusp2/kernel lists that > > they had a platform implementation that worked. > > > > Perhaps they had no reason to post? Anyone out there with a laptop > > with a suspend to disk in formware/platform using ACPI that works? > > I'd love to be proven wrong... > > I guess you mean most users of the original pmdisk code, as it originally > defaulted to platform (which in most cases should be ACPI S4). I mean, S4 > is not even remotely as obscure as S3. Then again, S4BIOS or other > firmware methods are different beasts. > > For the reference, original pmdisk code worked fine with platform on my > laptop the last time I checked (several months ago). > Could you try again with latest -mm kernel? It is possible that it simply got broken while it had very small number of users. Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms