From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267705AbUHJUO6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:14:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267700AbUHJUNC (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:13:02 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:37032 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267701AbUHJUMY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:12:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:12:17 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: James Morris Cc: Chris Wright , Alan Cox , Kurt Garloff , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Stephen Smalley , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks Message-ID: <20040810131217.Q1924@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20040810130009.P1924@build.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jmorris@redhat.com on Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:07:42PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com) wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Chris Wright wrote: > > Is this new (i.e. you just did this)? It's basically the same result we > > had from a few years ago. > > Yes, did it today. Thanks, James. Since these are the only concrete numbers and they are in the noise, I see no compelling reason to change to unlikely(). thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net