From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267472AbUHJPjk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:39:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267475AbUHJPhD (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:37:03 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([81.31.5.130]:53473 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267488AbUHJPg1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:36:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:36:10 +0200 From: Martin Mares To: Joerg Schilling Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, axboe@suse.de, eric@lammerts.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices Message-ID: <20040810153610.GA19005@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <200408101515.i7AFFwGs014308@burner.fokus.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408101515.i7AFFwGs014308@burner.fokus.fraunhofer.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > As the people who did create the bastardized version of cdrecord > you are using did not make clear where the official defaults file > for cdrecord is located, they did violate the license of cdrecord. What part of the license exactly? Also, if they modified the location of the file (which is reasonable if the default location doesn't conform to they filesystem layout), they should make clear where the _new_ location is, mentioning the original one is completely irrelevant. Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth "One single semicolon. A perfect drop of perliness. The rest is padding." -- S. Manandhar