From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268489AbUHLSQD (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:16:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268493AbUHLSQD (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:16:03 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:51676 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268489AbUHLSPz (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:15:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:15:51 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Greg KH Cc: James Morris , Kurt Garloff , Chris Wright , Linux kernel list , Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks Message-ID: <20040812111551.L1924@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20040811222213.GB14744@tpkurt.garloff.de> <20040812035854.GA3556@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20040812035854.GA3556@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 08:58:54PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:19PM -0400, James Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > > > The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO. > > > > > > Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet. > > > > Defaulting to the capability module is a separate discussion. I > > personally don't have a strong opinion on this issue. > > > > Chris, Stephen, Greg? :-) > > I don't really care. But I think almost every LSM module so far really > wants the capabilities module at the same time, right? Maybe we should > make it easier to do that than what is necessary today. Yes, we should. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net