From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268651AbUHLSSX (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:18:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268649AbUHLSRf (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:17:35 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:62428 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268648AbUHLSRV (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:17:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:17:18 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: James Morris Cc: Kurt Garloff , Chris Wright , Linux kernel list , Stephen Smalley , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks Message-ID: <20040812111718.M1924@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20040811222213.GB14744@tpkurt.garloff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jmorris@redhat.com on Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:19PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com) wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO. > > > > Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet. > > Defaulting to the capability module is a separate discussion. I > personally don't have a strong opinion on this issue. I've considering doing something like this. Any chance you could separate that bit of the patch out to work with? thanks -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net