From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267473AbUHPGwZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:52:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267474AbUHPGwZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:52:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:976 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267469AbUHPGwR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:52:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:52:04 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: "O.Sezer" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com, Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4] blacklist a device in usb-storage Message-Id: <20040815235204.0e9ec874@lembas.zaitcev.lan> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:22:20 +0300 "O.Sezer" wrote: > The disk in question is VID/PID=0b86:5110 32mb JMTek/eXputer disk. > http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/showdev.php?id=1092 says it can > never be supported through usb-storage because it claims to be > usb storage compliant but is not. >[...] > If there's any other way of preventing usb-storage to take- > over this disk, then tell me and despise my ignorance, > Otherwise, Marcelo please apply ;) I do not understand what the objective might be. Just do not use that thing with Linux kernel 2.4. Why do you wish "to revent usb-storage from taking over this disk"? -- Pete