From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: xerces8 <xerces8@butn.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: New versioning scheme ? ( 2.6.8.1 )
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:14:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040816081437.GD25783@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <WorldClient-F200408150404.AA04094351@butn.net>
Hi!
> Can someone tell me why the ages old, established versioning scheme of
> x.y.z was "abolished" and x.y.z.w was introduced ?
No idea, I'd prefer for that kernel to be called 2.6.9. Anyway...
When 2.6.9 comes out, will it be relative to 2.6.8 or to 2.6.8.1?
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-16 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 2:04 xerces8
2004-08-15 3:18 ` Gene Heskett
2004-08-15 7:23 ` Barry K. Nathan
2004-08-16 8:14 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040816081437.GD25783@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=xerces8@butn.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome