From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268496AbUHQWmS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:42:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268494AbUHQWlw (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:41:52 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:2229 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268489AbUHQWlD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:41:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:44:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: hari@in.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fastboot@osdl.org, suparna@in.ibm.com, mbligh@aracnet.com, litke@us.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [RFC]Kexec based crash dumping Message-Id: <20040817154436.529ba9f6.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040817120239.GA3916@in.ibm.com> References: <20040817120239.GA3916@in.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hariprasad Nellitheertha wrote: > > The patches that follow contain the initial implementation for kexec based > crash dumping that we are working on. It seems to be coming together nicely. Where do we stand with support for other architectures? Do you expect that each architecture will involve a lot of work? And how much of the i386 implementation do you expect x86_64 can reuse?