mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: straighten out the IDE layer locking and add hotplug
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:12:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408171612.37898.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408171512.26568.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>


one more comment

> > @@ -931,15 +1138,25 @@
> >   */
> >  }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Register an IDE interface, specifying exactly the registers etc
> > - * Set init=1 iff calling before probes have taken place.
> > +/**
> > + *	ide_register_hw		-	register IDE interface
> > + *	@hw: hardware registers
> > + *	@hwifp: pointer to returned hwif
> > + *
> > + *	Register an IDE interface, specifying exactly the registers etc
> > + *	Set init=1 iff calling before probes have taken place. The
> > + *	ide_cfg_sem protects this against races.
> > + *
> > + *	Returns -1 on error.
> >   */
> > +
> >  int ide_register_hw (hw_regs_t *hw, ide_hwif_t **hwifp)
> >  {
> >  	int index, retry = 1;
> >  	ide_hwif_t *hwif;
> >
> > +	down(&ide_cfg_sem);
> > +
> >  	do {
> >  		for (index = 0; index < MAX_HWIFS; ++index) {
> >  			hwif = &ide_hwifs[index];
> > @@ -950,28 +1167,37 @@
> >  			hwif = &ide_hwifs[index];
> >  			if (hwif->hold)
> >  				continue;
> > -			if ((!hwif->present && !hwif->mate && !initializing) ||
> > +			if ((!hwif->configured && !hwif->mate && !initializing) ||
> >  			    (!hwif->hw.io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] && initializing))
> >  				goto found;
> >  		}
> > +		/* FIXME- this check should die as should the retry loop */
> >  		for (index = 0; index < MAX_HWIFS; index++)
> > -			ide_unregister(index);
> > +		{
> > +			hwif = &ide_hwifs[index];
> > +			__ide_unregister_hwif(hwif);
> > +		}
> >  	} while (retry--);
> > +
> > +	up(&ide_cfg_sem);
> >  	return -1;
> >  found:
> > -	if (hwif->present)
> > -		ide_unregister(index);
> > +	/* FIXME: do we really need this case */
> > +	if (hwif->configured)
> > +		__ide_unregister_hwif(hwif);
> >  	else if (!hwif->hold) {
> >  		init_hwif_data(hwif, index);
> >  		init_hwif_default(hwif, index);
> >  	}
> > -	if (hwif->present)
> > +	if (hwif->configured)
> >  		return -1;
> > +	hwif->configured = 1;

this is dubious for many non PCI drivers which use ide_register_hw() to only
claim/fill ide_hwifs[] entry but actual probing is done later by ide-generic 
driver - we end up with hwif->present == 0 and hwif->configured == 1
and if ide_register_hw() will try to unregister such hwif it will possibly 
crash (because we now check for ->configured not ->present in 
ide_unregister_hwif) - you've correctly noticed in the FIXMEs that we 
shouldn't be unregistering hwifs in ide_register_hw() but this has some 
side-effects (breaks HDIO_SCAN_HWIF for all non default/generic hwifs
and can change ordering in some rare situations) - we should go that way but 
we need to be fully aware of results of this change

> >  	memcpy(&hwif->hw, hw, sizeof(*hw));
> >  	memcpy(hwif->io_ports, hwif->hw.io_ports, sizeof(hwif->hw.io_ports));
> >  	hwif->irq = hw->irq;
> >  	hwif->noprobe = 0;
> >  	hwif->chipset = hw->chipset;
> > +	up(&ide_cfg_sem);
> >
> >  	if (!initializing) {
> >  		probe_hwif_init(hwif);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-17 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-15 15:13 Alan Cox
2004-08-16 17:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 17:36   ` Alan Cox
2004-08-16 22:29     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 21:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 13:12 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 14:05   ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 14:30     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 14:46       ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 15:05         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 15:33           ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 14:40     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 14:12   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2004-08-17 14:18     ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 14:35       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200408171612.37898.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --to=b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®