From: <spaminos-ker@yahoo.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:08:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040817230825.4509.qmail@web13904.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040811093945.GA10667@elte.hu>
--- Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> could you also try the 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 kernel? It has the array-switch
> disabled which _could_ lead to smoother timeslice distribution. It still
> has wakeup bonuses though.
>
> Ingo
Sorry I didn't have the chance to try this test before: I didn't try it on
2.6.8.1-mm1 as I saw that maybe the patch related to the array sawitching was
dropped.
Anyway, I tried the test on 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 and it fails the test with 2 and 20
threads (delays of about 3 seconds for 2 threads, and 5 seconds with 20).
Nicolas
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-17 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040811093945.GA10667@elte.hu>
2004-08-17 23:08 ` spaminos-ker [this message]
[not found] <411D50AE.5020005@bigpond.net.au>
2004-08-17 23:19 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-18 0:12 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 21:11 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-24 23:04 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 23:22 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-26 2:30 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-26 2:42 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-26 8:39 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-28 1:59 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 0:21 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 0:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 0:45 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 2:03 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 2:28 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 4:53 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 1:19 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 1:22 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 1:31 ` Peter Williams
2004-09-13 20:09 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 2:20 ` Lee Revell
[not found] <20040811010116.GL11200@holomorphy.com>
2004-08-11 2:21 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-11 2:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11 2:45 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 2:47 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:23 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:31 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 3:46 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:44 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-13 0:13 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-13 1:44 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 10:24 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-12 2:04 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12 2:24 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12 2:53 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-07 21:53 spaminos-ker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040817230825.4509.qmail@web13904.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=spaminos-ker@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®