From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268408AbUHTRiz (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:38:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268429AbUHTRiz (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:38:55 -0400 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:24635 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268408AbUHTRiM (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:38:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:38:35 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Dave Hansen , "Randy.Dunlap" , Matt Mackall Cc: Matt Mackall , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: ketchup versus patch-kernel Message-ID: <20040820193835.GB7298@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Hansen , "Randy.Dunlap" , Matt Mackall , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1093021608.15662.1228.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1093021608.15662.1228.camel@nighthawk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:06:48AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > Since 2.6.8.1 came out, I'm sure a lot of automated tools stopped > working, ketchup included. Can someone please explain to me what is the difference between patch-kernel and ketchup? With difference I ask for what problem they solve (and mayby how). I know very well ketchup uses phython - thats an implementation detail. Rationale behind the question is if we should include both patch-kernel and ketchup in the kernel. Sam