From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267754AbUHUUJw (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:09:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267751AbUHUUJw (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:09:52 -0400 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20]:63683 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267759AbUHUUJq (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:09:46 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] shows Active/Inactive on per-node meminfo Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:09:02 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: amgta@yacht.ocn.ne.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, colpatch@us.ibm.com References: <200408210302.25053.amgta@yacht.ocn.ne.jp> <200408201501.31542.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040820152551.03a4aee7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040820152551.03a4aee7.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408211609.02869.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, August 20, 2004 6:25 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > So was that an ack, a nack or a quack? Ack. It looks ok to me, it just reminded me that /proc/meminfo will hurt a lot on a big machine, but this patch messes with /sys/.../nodeX/meminfo, so it's fine with me, and is in fact quite useful. Jesse