From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269014AbUHZOxb (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:53:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269019AbUHZOud (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:50:33 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:59799 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268961AbUHZOt2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:49:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:46:06 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Hans Reiser , Rik van Riel Cc: Mikulas Patocka , Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Message-ID: <20040826144606.GM3125@marowsky-bree.de> References: <412DA1FD.4010507@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <412DA1FD.4010507@namesys.com> X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2004-08-26T01:40:29, Hans Reiser said: > >Obviously this is something that needs to be sorted out at > >the VFS layer. > > > It needs to be sorted out, whether it is sorted out at the VFS layer is > unimportant. So what exactly is wrong with sorting it out at the VFS layer, and why do you _insist_ on sorting it in the reiserfs4 core? I'm missing something, please fill me in on the details. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- High Availability & Clustering \\\ /// SUSE Labs, Research and Development \honk/ SUSE LINUX AG - A Novell company \\//