From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@yahoo.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add PCI ROMs to sysfs
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:40:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040826154049.69769.qmail@web14923.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040826131346.GK16196@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
I was computing the length because of the need to copy for the
partially decoded case. I have one card that maps a 40KB ROM with a
512KB window. In that case it makes a 450KB different in the copy size.
The copy case is adding a lot of complexity to the code. We could just
give it the boot and require that partially decoded drivers just turn
the ROM attribute off.
If not, how do I get the size from your algorithm?
--- Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:06:38PM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > New version attached fixes this and the function documentation.
>
> Sorry, I found two more bugs ;-(
>
> > +unsigned char *
> > +pci_map_rom(struct pci_dev *pdev, size_t *size)
> > +{
> [...]
> > + /* Standard PCI ROMs start out with these three bytes 55 AA
> size/512 */
> > + if ((*rom == 0x55) && (*(rom + 1) == 0xAA))
> > + *size = *(rom + 2) * 512; /* return true ROM size, not PCI
> window size */
>
> First, you're dereferencing an ioremapped pointer directly instead of
> using readb() et al. This is a portability no-no but happens to work
> on x86.
>
> Second, only images of code type 0 (Intel x86, PC-AT compatible) are
> specified to have length as the third byte. OpenFirmware, PA-RISC
> and
> EFI may or may not have size as the third byte. It's also possible
> that there are multiple images in the ROM. So what you have to do to
> be correct is something like ...
>
> int last_image;
> char *image = rom;
> do {
> char *pds;
> if (readb(image) != 0x55)
> break;
> if (readb(image + 1) != 0xAA)
> break;
> pds = image + readw(image + 16);
> if (readb(pds) != 'P')
> break;
> if (readb(pds + 1) != 'C')
> break;
> if (readb(pds + 2) != 'I')
> break;
> if (readb(pds + 3) != 'R')
> break;
> last_image = readb(pds + 21) & 0x80;
> image += readw(pds + 16) * 512;
> } while (!last_image);
>
> But I'm not sure it's worth it. I'm inclined to just map the whole
> thing.
>
> --
> "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
> the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
> conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and
> refuse
> to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by
> convince
> himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
>
> he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark
> Twain
>
=====
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-26 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-11 23:27 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-08-12 0:22 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 2:22 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-13 18:17 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-14 5:34 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-14 9:47 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-14 14:17 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-14 22:10 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-14 23:39 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-18 18:13 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-18 18:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-23 22:51 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 17:32 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-25 17:42 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 18:06 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-25 18:19 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 18:45 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-25 18:55 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 20:06 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-26 13:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-26 15:40 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2004-08-26 15:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-26 19:54 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-28 16:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-28 17:33 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-28 17:38 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-27 16:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-27 22:29 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-28 16:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-28 21:53 ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-25 18:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-19 12:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-19 23:00 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-19 14:01 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-19 23:11 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-20 10:26 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-25 15:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-25 15:50 ` Jon Smirl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-08 3:15 Jon Smirl
2004-09-08 6:07 ` Greg KH
2004-09-08 23:50 ` Greg KH
2004-10-08 2:20 ` Jon Smirl
2004-11-05 23:06 ` Greg KH
2004-09-03 1:40 Jon Smirl
2004-09-03 17:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-03 17:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-03 18:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-29 4:58 Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 8:39 Thomas Winischhofer
2004-08-04 15:57 Petr Vandrovec
2004-08-04 17:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-05 1:38 ` Jon Smirl
2004-07-30 21:09 Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 21:29 ` Greg KH
2004-07-30 21:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 21:39 ` Greg KH
2004-07-30 21:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 22:15 ` Jon Smirl
2004-07-31 15:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-02 17:02 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-02 17:29 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-02 21:00 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-02 21:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-02 23:32 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-02 23:30 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-03 2:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 2:32 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-03 17:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 21:19 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-03 21:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 21:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 21:31 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-03 21:36 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-03 21:39 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-05 5:05 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-05 5:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-05 11:53 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-05 15:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-05 16:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-05 20:45 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-05 21:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-06 21:14 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-06 22:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 17:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 17:28 ` Greg KH
2004-08-11 18:02 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 18:12 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 1:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-12 14:38 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-12 17:29 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 2:25 ` Miles Bader
2004-08-12 4:38 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 9:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-12 22:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-11 19:24 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-11 19:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 20:11 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 23:31 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 11:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-12 20:28 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 0:45 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 4:37 ` Greg KH
2004-08-04 6:08 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-04 15:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 21:53 ` Jon Smirl
2004-07-31 10:03 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-31 13:28 ` Jon Smirl
2004-07-31 15:42 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040826154049.69769.qmail@web14923.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=jonsmirl@yahoo.com \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=mj@ucw.cz \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®