From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267772AbUH2MKa (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:10:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267786AbUH2MKa (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:10:30 -0400 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:6979 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267772AbUH2MKZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:10:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:11:53 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Roman Zippel , "Christian T. Steigies" , Linux/m68k , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: kernel-image-2.6.7 Message-ID: <20040829121153.GA30301@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Sam Ravnborg , Roman Zippel , "Christian T. Steigies" , Linux/m68k , Linux Kernel Development References: <20040822101914.GA7480@skeeve> <4128C3F4.6070507@linux-m68k.org> <20040826195643.GI9539@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Conclusions: gcc 2.95.2 and binutils 2.9.5 are fine for compiling 2.6.x kernels > for m68k, but: > - You need a newer binutils for building initramfs (make usr/) > - You need a newer binutils for building modular kernels with > CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y Is this something you can make a check for in arch/m68k/Makefile? Just so others don't hit the same trap.. Sam