From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266519AbUHaE2c (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:28:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266531AbUHaE2c (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:28:32 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:53146 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266519AbUHaE2a (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:28:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:26:32 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Roland McGrath Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup ptrace stops and remove notify_parent Message-Id: <20040830212632.392cf5f5.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200408310411.i7V4B8Vs027772@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <20040830204332.24da5615.akpm@osdl.org> <200408310411.i7V4B8Vs027772@magilla.sf.frob.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roland McGrath wrote: > > > It clashes significantly with your waitid syscall patch. Which one do you > > believe has priority? > > I of course already have a tree with both reconciled. I did this ptrace > patch independently against Linus's tree since it was based on suggestions > from Linus and I thought he might like to try it and perhaps merge it > before my other patches in -mm go in. Well given that waitid ha baked for a bit longer I guess we'd best make this patch come afterwards. So if you could redo this patch against rc1-mm1, please?