From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-lkml@gmx.net>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, drepper@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael.kerrisk@gmx.net,
Tonnerre <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] waitid system call
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:04:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408310604.i7V64k7o010652@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Michael Kerrisk's message of Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:51:02 +0200 <12606.1093348262@www48.gmx.net>
The AIX results someone posted suggested that it does not clear siginfo_t
fields on WNOHANG early returns. I still maintain that a POSIX application
must not assume that waitid will clear any fields. However, since the
majority do, I see no harm in making Linux do so as well.
Andrew, please throw this on top of the waitid patches. This patch is
relative to 2.6.9-rc1-mm1.
Thanks,
Roland
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
--- linux-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/exit.c.~1~ 2004-08-27 13:46:37.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/exit.c 2004-08-30 22:52:54.246036355 -0700
@@ -1369,8 +1369,29 @@ check_continued:
end:
current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
remove_wait_queue(¤t->wait_chldexit,&wait);
- if (infop && retval > 0)
+ if (infop) {
+ if (retval > 0)
retval = 0;
+ else {
+ /*
+ * For a WNOHANG return, clear out all the fields
+ * we would set so the user can easily tell the
+ * difference.
+ */
+ if (!retval)
+ retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_signo);
+ if (!retval)
+ retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_errno);
+ if (!retval)
+ retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_code);
+ if (!retval)
+ retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_pid);
+ if (!retval)
+ retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_uid);
+ if (!retval)
+ retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_status);
+ }
+ }
return retval;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-31 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 23:03 Roland McGrath
2004-08-16 5:40 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-16 17:15 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-16 21:12 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-19 17:20 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-19 20:53 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-20 6:00 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-20 9:02 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-20 20:04 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-24 11:51 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-31 6:04 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2004-08-31 6:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-31 6:37 ` Roland McGrath
2004-08-31 6:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-31 15:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-08-31 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-31 23:51 ` Roland McGrath
2004-09-01 11:31 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-31 7:22 ` Michael Kerrisk
2004-08-22 8:53 ` Tonnerre
[not found] <2tCiy-8pK-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-16 0:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-16 2:10 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408310604.i7V64k7o010652@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.kerrisk@gmx.net \
--cc=mtk-lkml@gmx.net \
--cc=tonnerre@thundrix.ch \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®