Salut,

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:02:24AM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> I can see the argument for having the equivalent of Content-type or
> Content-transfer-encoding as a named stream though.

Why having them as  named streams if we can get them  as xattrs for no
additional pain? (Since fileutils would  have to be changed anyway, we
can even make cp copy and emacs update xattrs.)

			    Tonnerre